Panda’s real-time protection was excellent, detecting 100% of the malware samples during my tests. One scan only took around 60 minutes, but another took a whopping 8 hours! I ran a few separate full disk scans on my PC, and the scan times were very inconsistent. This is always good news, but even more so if scans take a long time - which Panda’s did. Panda’s scanner caused no slowdown while it was running. However, its performance on my Mac was disappointing - after 6 hours, it still hadn’t even scanned 50% of my drive, so I gave up. I tested it by hiding hundreds of malware files on my PC, and it found over 95% of them during its full disk scan. Panda has a really good malware scanner for Windows. Bitdefender also provides a number of customization options for its real-time protection, which advanced users will appreciate. The real-time protection was equally impressive, immediately blocking every malicious file before I was able to download it. The scanner uses a combination of machine learning and a huge malware directory to identify all of them. This means it uses very little of your device’s CPU and causes no slowdown during scans.īitdefender caught every single threat on my device - I tested it by hiding hundreds of viruses, ransomware, rootkits, and other types of malware samples. Bitdefender’s powerful malware engine is also extremely lightweight as it’s 100% cloud-based. Bitdefender vs. Panda: Malware Protectionīitdefender has an excellent malware scanner, which detected 100% of the malware samples during my tests.

If you want a decent antivirus for a specific number of devices, go with Panda. Panda offers more flexible pricing options. If you want one of the best and most affordable internet security suites in 2023, go with Bitdefender.

Bitdefender is better for overall security, extra features, and price.

Panda cloud free